More Pages: Cooper Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100


An Untenable, Myopic Assessment of the Antebellum South
Was Slavery the Cause of the Civil War?

Too much analysis, not enough biography
Term Paper Helper

Interesting but erraticFor instance, one chapter about estimating population growth is very good. It is objective. It details the assumptions, and explain why forecasting population growth is associated with a high level of uncertainty.
Another chapter on the future of energy consumption is really bad. It is a not so disguised subjective infomercial about alternative energy. Although promoting the use of alternative energy is really laudable, it should not be confused with objective and integer forecasting simulation. This one chapter should have never made it within this book in its existing form.
Insightful!

Rough Sailing
Don't be afraid of Cooper

Evidence not clear-cut as Cooper makes it out to beDr. Cooper was one of the first noted fitness experts to recommend people start taking high doses of the antioxidant vitamins beta-carotene (the precursor to vitamin A), vitamin C, and vitamin E, along with the mineral selenium. He recommends taking levels that are several times the RDA for these nutrients.
Cooper cites many scientific studies that show high does of these antioxidants reduce the risk of heart disease and cancer. However, this book was originally published in 1994, and more recent studies have not given unqualified support to these earlier studies. In fact, more recent studies have been mixed.
Some studies do show that taking antioxidants reduce risk, but other studies show there is no effect. I summarize many of these studies in a chapter on supplements in my book "Creationist Diet: Nutrition and God-given Foods According to the Bible." My conclusion is that there is some evidence for the benefit of taking antioxidants, but it is not clear-cut as Cooper makes it out to be. There may or may not be any benefit to the practice.
Further clouding whether to take these supplements is the risk of side effects. Fortunately, Cooper does list possible side effects one might experience.
Another issue that Cooper does not address is the cost factor. Vitamin C is rather inexpensive and vitamin E and selenium moderately so, but beta-carotene tends to be rather expensive. And beta-carotene is the antioxidant with the least evidence supporting it.
Given the split evidence, I would say that if money is tight, one should spend their money on healthy food, not supplements. It is foods like fruits and vegetables that have unqualified evidence for their health benefits. And Cooper does include information on what foods are highest in the antioxidants and how best to prepare them to retain the nutrients. And my book provides further details on what foods help to reduce the risk of heart disease, cancer, and strokes.
As for myself, I have tried taking antioxidants in the amounts Cooper recommends, but I ended up with some of the side effects he mentions. I even tried taking different brands and forms of each nutrient and still had problems. So I simply don't bother with them anymore and focus on eating a healthy diet instead.
New Recommendations Supplant the Info in this Book
A Word to the Wise . . .The prudent reader will consider the Institute's report before joining Dr. Cooper's revolution...


Colorful background about two great museums.The problem with "The Bone Vault" is that the mystery element is almost nonexistent. There is no tension, there are no thrills, and the ending is almost anticlimactic. However, as in Fairstein's "The Deadhouse," the author's thorough research has made "The Bone Vault" a treasure trove of information. The reader is treated to arcane and fascinating details about two of the greatest museums in the world, the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the Museum of Natural History. We learn about their vast and varied collections, their tremendous storehouses, and the army of people who keep these institutions up and running. Fairstein loves her subject; her enthusiasm and vivid descriptions make the museums the most interesting characters in the book.
Fairstein, as always, writes lighthearted and cute banter for Alex and her friends, and she is always sharp when it comes to legal matters and police procedure. The book could have been so much better had Fairstein written a more intriguing story. As it stands, I give "The Bone Vault" a marginal recommendation.
This is without a doubt Linda Fairstein's best novel yetWith each of her five novels since FINAL JEOPARDY (her first), she has displayed an increasingly smooth storytelling style uniquely her own. If her books read a lot like true crime, it's because she knows her material down to the most intimate detail. Fairstein's daily work routine has become the stuff of television legend, via Law & Order, particularly Law & Order: SVU, which stands for the department she originated --- not in fiction but in real life. She has made an enormous contribution to the now-safer streets of New York City and, with her retirement, will certainly be missed. We who like to read are lucky because we now have her full-time attention as a writer.
In her fifth outing with her DA protagonist, Alexandra Cooper, Linda Fairstein takes us into a fascinating behind-the-scenes world at the Metropolitan Museum and its offshoot for medieval art history, The Cloisters, as well as the New York Museum of Natural History. They have been planning a 3-way cooperative exhibit on Beastiaries, Real and Imagined (a fictional exhibit that sounds like such a great idea, I wanted to see it for myself). The victim is a young, promising museum employee of The Cloisters who worked on that exhibit. Her perfectly preserved body is found inside an ancient limestone sarcophagus that was about to be shipped abroad, as part of a large shipment of art on exchange from the Metropolitan. Within 24 hours of the body's discovery, the Met's famous Director has resigned. He claims his resignation has no relationship whatever to the finding of the body but, of course, Alex and her team members, Mike Chapman and Mercer Wallace, are not so easily convinced.
An autopsy reveals that the victim died of arsenic poisoning and that she had been dead for almost six months. How did the body come to be in such perfect condition after such a long time? More interesting speculations occur when the head of the museum's Egyptian Collection leaves to attend a "mummy congress" in Chile --- it seems he is the world's foremost expert on mummification. And so onward, the story goes.
Linda Fairstein is deadly serious about her concern over crime (sex crimes in particular) and her novels reflect this concern. But THE BONE VAULT is, nevertheless, fun to read. It is no small achievement to be able to write heavy stuff with a light touch, but she has pulled it off for much of the book. If you enjoy going to museums, this will be a treat for you. Even if museums aren't quite your ideal for crime story enrichment, you'll find a lot of other little tidbits that add to the narrative. These tidbits include insight into Alan Dershowitz's Martha's Vineyard beach habits and in what movie you might catch a glimpse of William Shatner's pubic hair ... if you have sharp eyes and are inclined to look.
THE BONE VAULT is Linda Fairstein's best yet.
--- Reviewed by Ava Dianne Day
Death in the Museum

Poorly executed
Innocents in Twain
A wonderful, leisurely read!

Nearly impossible to finish
For Intermediate Level C# ProgrammersIf I had to rate the book overall, I would give it an "average" rating, as the book just doesn't seem to stand out among all the other titles available. The book seems to fit best with a specific audience. People who would benefit the most from this book are intermediate-level C# programmers, who know very little about object oriented design patters.
If you are a beginner with C#, this book is not for you. The Basics of C# are covered very quickly in the first 7 chapters, but does not go into detail enough to help novice programmers. In fact, I cannot understand why those chapters are included at all. The materials in those chapters breeze over the C# language too fast for C# beginners, but at the same time, it is far too basic for those who have experience with C#. Beginners would be better suited picking up a introduction to C# book and working with the language for a little while before reading C# Design Patterns.
Intermediate C# programmers with little knowledge of object-oriented design patterns will develop a new skill set from reading the book. The everyday usefulness of these design patterns makes a book on the subject a very worthwhile read. If the reader is already familiar with C# than this book is a good choice from them.
The code samples presented in the book are well constructed and the accompanying CD provides has provided benefit whenever I wanted to see a full code listing. For certain code listings in the book, I would have liked to see a few more comments. Sometimes, it takes a little while to understand exactly what the author is doing with the code. The screenshots and figures do a very nice job representing the concepts visually.
One of the best attributes in this book is the thought questions at the end of the chapter. They really get the reader to think and make sure they understand the concepts before continuing. Having a through understanding of each pattern is crucial as later patterns either build or use patterns which have already been learned.
People who have read James Cooper's previous works such as Java Design Patterns or Visual Basic Design Patterns or Design Patterns by Erich Gamma, Richard Helm, Ralph Johnson, and John Vlissides really do not have a need for this book. This book covers all of the same material as those other works.
I have noticed several typos and minor mistakes throughout the book, which is getting far too common in technology books in general. With that aside, I would recommend this book to anyone who knows a good bit of C# and would like to learn about Design Patterns used in Object Oriented programming. I would also recommend that these people skip the first 7 chapters or quickly skim over them. As for anyone else, I would suggest passing on this title, and getting a book that caters to design principles in a language they are more familiar with.
Good IntroductionThe first part of the book covers the mere basics of Visual Studio .NET, the C# language, object programming concepts and UML diagrams. I feel this section is not necessary since there are abundant books available.
I'd also like to see in future editions a heavy-duty application designed throughout the book using most, if not all of the 23 patterns. -- Review by Timothy D.


Not a Lot Here...In the whole novel there is not a single character (including Holmes) who comes to life even for an instant. There is no plot, and all the characters, including Holmes, behave in a way both inexplicable and imbecilic. [For example, although we are told on every page that Elizabeth is so impossibly beautiful, etc., see above, that no man or woman can take his eyes off her, Holmes and Elizabeth waddle mindlessly and undisguised through Europe, always amazed when Moriarty's men track them down or trap them.]
The author's imagination runs pretty much on empty as far as having Holmes be away from Baker Street for three years, so for two of them Holmes and Elizabeth do nothing but tend goats and have wild, crazy nightly sex in an isolated Tibetan village. Holmes hikes to Lhasa, looks in at Mecca, and fiddles with coal-tar derivatives in France only because these are markers from the Canon, not because this novel's character would be motivated to do such.
Despite all the problems, I must say that Ms. Cooper-Posey is a competent writer. I kept turning the pages despite the lack of intellectual stimulation, lack of character development, and lack of any plot whatsoever. However, at the end, I must say that the total sum of enjoyment I experienced was quite small, and that the total burden of mild outrage at the way my time and interest had been taken advantage of was noticable.
Chronicles of the Lost Years -- a good read
Graceful, detailed, original -- the prose sings!Cindy Penn Reviewer

Cooper identifies four factors that animated the "politics of slavery": the institution of slavery itself, southern parties and politicians, the political structure of the South, and the values of white southern society. Cooper would certainly agree that the North and South were culturally different in the antebellum era. He describes this sectional difference in political terms: local issues predominated in northern politics, whereas slavery dominated southern political discourse. Conditionally, southerners viewed parties' roles differently than did their northern counterparts--southerners relied on the national parties to work for the preservation of southern rights within the nation. Local issues were irrelevant in the South, Cooper argues repeatedly, compared to the indomitable politics of slavery. He rejects emphatically the common belief that economic matters defined party politics in the era of the second party system. Cooper dismisses the crucial significance of economic and diverse social issues at the local and state level by placing over each such issue a mask of proslavery. Specific issues emerged and faded, he argues, but slavery remained always at the core of each one. He does not seek to understand just who became Whigs or who became Democrats or the reasons why, for he sees in the South a unified system of political thought. Cooper's argument is almost circular: the drive for southern rights shaped the national party structure, but this selfsame party system fostered sectionalism within the parties and essentially destroyed the second party system. Cooper insists that the Democrats enjoyed political hegemony in the South in the late 1850s because no new party could replace the Whigs under the unspoken rules of the southern political system; the existence of anti-Democratic voters--who were a large minority of the southern population--and the existence of local issues could not subsume the slavery issue in politics. Cooper relies mainly on data from Presidential elections, ignoring nonpresidential contests at the state and local level. This approach prevents him from acknowledging the lack of unity and order in southern politics. He refuses to admit the existence of discord not only between but within parties, and he is blind to any evidence that the South was anything but unified in proslavery ideology by the 1850s.